WebP vs JPEG vs PNG for the web

WebP often beats JPEG and PNG on file size for the same visual quality, but PNG still wins for transparency and JPEG still wins for maximum compatibility.

Last updated: June 26, 2026

WebP vs JPEG vs PNG

WebPJPEGPNG
CompressionLossy or losslessLossyLossless (or palette reduction)
TransparencyYesNoYes
Typical web useHero photos, thumbnails, responsive imagesFallback photos, email attachmentsLogos, icons, UI, screenshots
Browser supportAll major browsers today; check legacy embedsUniversalUniversal
File size (photos)Often smallest at similar qualitySmallUsually largest

Why WebP is not a full JPEG replacement

WebP uses modern compression that often delivers smaller files than JPEG at the same perceived quality. That helps Core Web Vitals and mobile bandwidth.

Some offline workflows—certain email clients, older CMS importers, or print shops—still expect JPEG or PNG. Export WebP for your site and keep a JPEG master when compatibility is unknown.

Pick a format

WebP

You publish to a website or app you control and can serve WebP (often with JPEG fallback elsewhere).

Image Converter

JPEG

Maximum compatibility for photos, newsletters, and uploads to platforms that reject WebP.

Image Compressor

PNG

Transparency, crisp text, or lossless graphics—even if the file is larger.

Image Compressor
Should I convert every PNG photo to WebP?

Only when the image is photo-heavy and you do not need transparency. Logos and UI should stay PNG or SVG.

Does Pixlery support WebP conversion locally?

Yes. Image Converter and Image Compressor handle WebP alongside JPG and PNG in the browser.

How does this relate to PNG vs JPEG?

See the PNG vs JPEG guide for the photo-vs-graphics split; this page adds WebP into that decision for web delivery.

Use Pixlery tools

Related reading